her job looks in serious doubt after her brexit deal is comprehensively rejected next month, so she'd be the ideal choice as a presenter for a new version of deal or no deal.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mc9y_vskli.
potential outcome: deal rejected, and march 30th 2019 sees the uk still in the eu thanks to the implementation of article 50 being suspended/delayed - in order for more talks to prevent the uk "crashing out" without a deal.
new referendum looms..
Her job looks in serious doubt after her Brexit deal is comprehensively rejected next month, so she'd be the ideal choice as a presenter for a new version of Deal or No Deal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mc9Y_VsklI
Potential outcome: deal rejected, and March 30th 2019 sees the UK still in the EU thanks to the implementation of article 50 being suspended/delayed - in order for more talks to prevent the UK "crashing out" without a deal. New referendum looms.
take a look at this, fellow forum members .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5d7eoodv3e .
f**king brilliant xd.
thoughts?.
What about their human rights? :)
uk prime minister could be out of her job within hours.
.
regardless, another referendum on stay/leave looks very likely - now that people can see what the real consequences of a divorce from the eu would be..
PM's apparent strategy - "I've got no chance of getting this bad deal accepted by any group, so I'll stick with it and force the UK parliament to vote on it and reject it. Then I can blame others for landing the UK in a no-deal calamity." Sheesh!
uk prime minister could be out of her job within hours.
.
regardless, another referendum on stay/leave looks very likely - now that people can see what the real consequences of a divorce from the eu would be..
UK Prime Minister could be out of her job within hours.
Regardless, another referendum on stay/leave looks very likely - now that people can see what the real consequences of a divorce from the EU would be.
https://youtu.be/f40ukvgjsqw.
is it the first of april already?.
I wonder how much the fleeced sheep in the local congregations were persuaded to hand over for these recruitment screens.
this sundays 11/18 wt p.18 pp.3.
/ happy are those who serve "the happy god".
"stressful events-such as when a loved one dies or is disfellowshipped...".
Excellent news for you both!!
The sick teachings of the org's writing committee goes from bad to putrid and the mind-numbing of the average JW is starting to reach fever-pitch.
The CLAM meeting format & methods are more applicable for prepubescent minds.
are r & f jehovah's witnesses aware of the fact that their faithful slave-masters exclude them from being members of the christian congregation?.
w71 7/15 p. 430 par.
8 - membership in the christian congregation is strictly limited in number.
Are r & f Jehovah's Witnesses aware of the fact that their faithful slave-masters exclude them from being members of the Christian congregation?
w71 7/15 p. 430 par. 8 - Membership in the Christian congregation is strictly limited in number. Jesus spoke of them as a “little flock,” and three times in the book of Revelation the actual number is given as 144,000.
A helluva lot of JW history is just begging to be re-written electronically!
i no longer trust the search engine at the official jw website since they have quietly modified, purged, and expunged—or simply made no longer available—so many old works/pubs., so i'm asking for help finding an old article that likely predates the late 1970s (?).
i think it was an article rather than in a book, but i can't be sure.
the article's focus was on what it means for the anointed to be declared righteous.. it's important, i suspect, for grasping the view that whatever the gb decide is completely god-directed, so that, in effect, even though the org might officially deny it, the gb are viewed as infallible in practical terms.
w74 2/1 p. 96 Questions From Readers - "In the case of those who will rule with Jesus Christ, Jehovah God, on the basis of his Son’s sacrifice, “declares them righteous” and thus views them as being perfect, without sin, while yet in the flesh on earth." (Rom. 8:33)
w79 9/1 p. 26 par. 11 The Royal “Shepherd” of Bible Prophecy
The members of this repentant, restored remnant of spiritual Israelites were cleansed and thus made fit to proclaim “this good news of the kingdom” internationally, in “all the inhabited earth.” (Matt. 24:9-14) In this way, by Jehovah’s undeserved kindness through Christ, they were declared righteous or were vindicated. Jehovah proved to be their Backer, their “champion,” and they became his Christian witnesses.
am i imagining this?at the kingdom hall we were told many times that noah warned the others about the coming flood and was ridiculed but actually there is no evidence of this in the bible!there is however evidence to the contrary.
matthew 24:37-39.
37 as it was in the days of noah, so it will be at the coming of the son of man.
Purely to contribute to the discussion about the different Bible translation's interpretations:
People didn’t realize what was going to happen until the flood came and swept them all away. NLT
and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. NIV
And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; KJV
and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; NASB
Devil's advocate: how could the people suddenly understand/realize/know what was happening at the commencement of the flood, if they had no prior conception or information about it?
They clearly had no faith/belief that such an unbelievable event would take place - despite the fact that the old man and his family were "putting their money where their mouths were" by building a huge wooden structure to float to safety.
Also, Jesus was making a comparison with the warning which he and his followers would issue to the Jewish nation regarding their impending demise and that of Noah's time.
The wording/translation quoted in some versions appear to be over-engineered - for whatever reason.
2 Peter 2:5 says that "Noah was a preacher of righteousness", so at the very least he was telling his contemporaries something which was unappealing.
the jehovah's witnesses claim that at death you cease to exist... however, what if they have been taught wrong?
what if the bible explains that there is life immediately after death?
what if more than 8 people in scripture from old testament to new experienced, acknowledged or taught that there was life straight after death?
In the video you say you cover the following :
1) Samuel prophesied in spirit after his death to King Saul,
2) David's child went to be with the Lord at death,
3) Moses and Elijah made an appearance to the Lord Jesus,
4) The Rich man and Lazarus in Luke 16,
5) Stephen was ready to go to Heaven at death,
6) Paul knew at death, he would be immediately with the Lord,
7) James' application of the spirit and the body,
8) The souls of the people who died in the tribulation, conversed with the Lord Jesus immediately afterwards,
9) What must I do to be saved?
Since you don't allow questions on YouTube, I'll ask one here;
At 41 mins36 secs, (referring to No.8 above) you put Revelation 6:9, 10 up on the screen and read it out. It says, "I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God."
But in your next statement you change the location to heaven. Why are you mimicking the Jehovah's Witnesses by adding words to scriptures to create a different meaning? Heaven is not mentioned in the verses you used.
When you assume something, you make an ass of u and me.
